Journal of Aerospace Science and Technology

Journal of Aerospace Science and Technology

The New Hybrid Meta-Model by Using DOE and RSM for Liquid Propellant Engine’s Feed System Optimization

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Aerospace Research Institute, Ministry of Science, Research and Technology, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Aerospace Research Institute, Ministry of Science, Research and Technology, Tehran, Iran
3 of Mechanical Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
The present paper strives for optimization of the Liquid-Propellant Engine (LPE)’s feed system. To this end, the new hybrid meta-model methodology by utilizing the Design of Experiment (DOE) method and the Response Surface Method (RSM) were developed and implemented as two effective means of designing, analyzing and optimizing. The input design variables, constraints, objective function, and their surfaces were identified. Then, the design and development strategy was clarified by utilizing the combination of RSM, DOE and regression analysis. Hence, 64 different experiments were carried out on the RD-253 propulsion system. The response surface curves were drawn and the related objective function equation was obtained. The Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) results indicate that, the developed hybrid model is capable to predict the responses adequately within the limits of input parameters. In addition, the precision of the model was assessed by comparing with the existing samples and the output was interpreted and analyzed that shown highly accuracy. Therefore, desirability function analysis has been applied to LPE’s feed system for achieving to maximize the power and minimize the weight, simultaneously. Finally, confirmatory tests have been conducted with the optimum parametric conditions to validate the optimization techniques. In conclusion, the methodology capability is to optimize the LPE system, an 11% increase in the power to feed system weight ratio and a 2% increase the thrust to engine weight ratio. These values are considerably large for LPE design.
Keywords

Subjects


[1] G. P. Sutton and O. Biblarz, Rocket Propulsion Elements, 8nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
[2] M. Son, J. Koo, W. Cho, and E. S. Lee, “Conceptual design for a kerosene fuel-rich gas-generator of a turbo-pump-fed liquid rocket engine,” Journal of Thermal Science, vol. 21, pp. 428-434, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-012-0564-z.
[3] K. S. Jeon, J. W. Lee, C. Lee, and J. W. Chang, “Optimal gas generator design for the liquid rocket engine,” in 42th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, Peper 2004-32, 2004, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2004-32.
[4] H. Burkhardt, M. Sippel, A. Herbertz, and J. Klevanski, “Comparative study of kerosene and methane propellant engines for reusable liquid booster stages,” in 4th International Conference on Launcher Technology “Space Launcher Liquid Propulsion”, Liège, Belgium, 2002.
[5] D. R. Jones, “Multivariable optimization of liquid rocket engines using particle swarm algorithms,” M. S. thesis, Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics in the Graduate School of The University of Alabama, United States. 2013.
[6] A. Butt, C. G. Popp, H. M. Pitts, and D. J. Sharp, “NASA ares i launch vehicle roll and reaction control systems design status,” in 45th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference &Exhibit, Denver, Colorado, 2008, Peper 5130, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2009-5130.
[7] M. Kanazaki, A. Ariyairt, K. Chiba, K. Kitagawa, and T. Shimada, “Conceptual design of single-stage rocket using hybrid rocket by means of genetic algorithm,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 99, pp. 198-207, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.526.
[8] D. W. Way and J. R. Olds, “SCORES: web-based rocket propulsion analysis tool for space transportation system design,” in 35th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, Los Angeles, CA, 1999.
[9] J. D. Shelton, R. A. Frederick, and A. W. Wilhite, “Launch vehicle propulsion design with multiple selection criteria”, Journal of Spacecraft Rockets, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 893–902, 2006, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.16919.
[10] A. Saqlain and H. Lin-shu, “Optimization and sizing for propulsion system of liquid rocket using genetic algorithm,” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 40–46, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1000-9361(07)60005-3.
[11] M. Shafaee, P. Mohammad Zadeh, A. Elkaie, and H. Fallah, “Design optimization of a thrust chamber using a mass-based model to improve the geometrical and performance parameters of low-thrust space propulsion systems,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, vol. 233, no. 5, pp. 1820-1837, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410018767288.
[12] X. B. lam, “Multidisciplinary design optimization for aircraft wing using response surface method, genetic algorithm, and simulated annealing,” Journal of Science and Technology in Civil Engineering (JSTCE)-HUCE, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 28-41, 2020, https://doi.org/10.31814/stce.nuce2020-14(1)-03.
[13] N. Soldà and D. Lentini, “Opportunities for a liquid rocket feed system based on electric pumps,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 31340-1346, 2008, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.35074.
[14] P. A. Pavlov Rachov, H. Tacca, and L. Lentini, “Electric feed systems for liquid-propellant rockets”, Journal of Propulsion and Power, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1171-1180, 2013, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B34714.
[15] S. A. Moussavi Torshizi, A. Hajilouy Benisi, and M. Durali, “Multi-level optimization of the splitter blade profile in the impeller of a centrifugal compressor,” Journal of Scientia Iranica Transactions B: Mechanical Engineering, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 707-714, 2017.
[16] M. Mojaddam and K. R. Pullen, “Optimization of a centrifugal compressor using the design of experiment technique,” Applied Science, vol. 9, no. 2, 2019, Art. no. 291, https://doi.org/10.3390/app9020291.
[17] L. Lei, H. Wan, W. Gao, F. Tong, and H. Li, “Reliability-based multidisciplinary design optimization of cooling turbine blade considering uncertainty data statistics,” Structural and multidisciplinary optimization, vol. 29, pp. 659-673, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-2081-5.
Volume 17, Issue 2
October 2024
Pages 110-124

  • Receive Date 24 October 2022
  • Revise Date 18 December 2023
  • Accept Date 27 December 2023
  • First Publish Date 27 December 2023