Journal of Aerospace Science and Technology

Journal of Aerospace Science and Technology

natural periodic orbit attitude behavior of satellites in three-body problem in the presence of the oblate primaries

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Tehran university
2 Tehran University
3 Assistant Professor Iran University of Science and Technology
Abstract
The main purpose of this article is to examine the periodic coupled orbit-attitude of a satellite at restricted three body problem considering both primaries oblateness perturbations. The proposed model was based on a simplified coupled model meaning that the time evolution of the orbital state variables was not a function of the attitude state variables. Since, the problem has no closed-formed solution, and the numerical methods must be used, so the problem can have different periodic or non-periodic responses to the initial conditions. The initial guess vector of the coupled model’s states was introduced to achieve the optimal initial conditions leading to the periodic responses, and then the P-CR3BP coupled orbit-attitude correction algorithm was proposed to correct this initial guess. Since, the number of periodic solutions is restricted; the suitable initial guess vector as the inputs of the coupled orbit-attitude correction algorithm increases the chances of achieving more accurate initial conditions. The initial guess of orbital states close to the initial conditions of the P-CR3BP periodic orbit, along with initial guess vector of attitude dynamics states with Poincaré mapping was suggested as the suitable initial guess vector of the coupled model.
Keywords

Subjects


[1]           J. P. Gardner et al., “The james webb space telescope,” Space Sci. Rev., vol. 123, no. 4, pp. 485–606, 2006.
[2]           J. Krist, P. Kalas “In the Spirit of Bernard Lyot: The Direct Detection of Planets and Circumstellar Disks in the 21st Century, ed,” (Berkeley, CA Univ. California), vol. 32, 2007.
[3]           M. Hechler and J. Cobos, “Herschel, Planck and Gaia orbit design,” in Libration Point Orbits and Applications, World Scientific, 2003, pp. 115–135.
[4]           M. Machula and G. Sandhoo, “Rendezvous and docking for space exploration,” in 1st Space exploration conference: continuing the voyage of discovery, 2005, p. 2716.
[5]           T. R. Kane and D. J. Shippy, “Attitude stability of a spinning unsymmetrical satellite in a circular orbit(Attitude stability of a spinning unsymmetrical satellite, with unequal moments of inertia, in a circular orbit),” J. Astronaut. Sci., vol. 10, pp. 114–119, 1963.
[6]           T. R. Kane and E. L. Marsh, “Attitude stability of a symmetric satellite at the equilibrium points in the restricted three-body problem,” Celest. Mech., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 78–90, 1971.
[7]           W. J. Robinson, “Attitude stability of a rigid body placed at an equilibrium point in the restricted problem of three bodies,” Celest. Mech., vol. 10, pp. 17–33, 1974.
[8]           B. Wong, R. Patil, and A. Misra, “Attitude dynamics of rigid bodies in the vicinity of the Lagrangian points,” J. Guid. Control. Dyn., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 252–256, 2008.
[9]           M. Sanjurjo-Rivo et al., “On the dynamics of a tethered system near the collinear libration points,” in AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, 2008, pp. 3218–3242.
[10]         D. Guzetti, R. Armellin, and M. Lavagna, “Coupling attitude and orbital motion of extended bodies in the restricted circular 3-body problem: A novel study on effects and possible exploitations,” in Proceedings of the 63rd International Astronautical Congress, Naples, Italy, 2012, pp. 5715–5728.
[11]         D. Guzzetti and K. C. Howell, “Coupled orbit-attitude dynamics in the three-body problem: A family of orbit-attitude periodic solutions,” in AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, 2014, p. 4100.
[12]         E. Canalias and J. J. Masdemont, “Homoclinic and heteroclinic transfer trajectories between Lyapunov orbits in the Sun-Earth and Earth-Moon systems,” Discret. Contin. Dyn. Syst, vol. 14, pp. 261–279, 2006.
[13]         J. Singh, A. E. Perdiou, J. M. Gyegwe, and E. A. Perdios, “Periodic solutions around the collinear equilibrium points in the perturbed restricted three-body problem with triaxial and radiating primaries for binary HD 191408, Kruger 60 and HD 155876 systems,” Appl. Math. Comput., vol. 325, pp. 358–374, 2018.
[14]         V. K. Srivastava, J. Kumar, P. Mishra, and B. S. Kushvah, “Halo orbit of regularized circular restricted three-body problem with radiation pressure and oblateness,” J. Astrophys. Astron., vol. 39, no. 5, p. 63, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s12036-018-9551-4.
[15]         V. V Markellos, K. E. Papadakis, and E. A. Perdios, “Non-linear stability zones around triangular equilibria in the plane circular restricted three-body problem with oblateness,” Astrophys. Space Sci., vol. 245, no. 1, pp. 157–164, 1996.
[16]         J. Singh and V. U. Cyril-Okeme, “Perturbed Robe’s circular restricted three-body problem under an oblate primary,” New Astron., vol. 34, pp. 114–119, 2015.
 
[17]         A. E. Perdiou, V. V Markellos, and C. N. Douskos, “THE HILL PROBLEM WITH OBLATE SECONDARY: NUMERICAL EXPLORATION,” Earth. Moon. Planets, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 127–145, 2005, doi: 10.1007/s11038-006-9065-y.
[18]         A. Colagrossi and M. Lavagna, “Preliminary results on the dynamics of large and flexible space structures in Halo orbits,” Acta Astronaut., vol. 134, pp. 355–367, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.02.020.
[19]         R. Schwarz, Á. Bazsó, B. Érdi, and B. Funk, “Stability of the Lagrangian point L 4 in the spatial restricted three-body problem–application to exoplanetary systems,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., vol. 427, no. 1, pp. 397–402, 2012.
[20]         E. Abbasali, A. Kosari, and M. Bakhtiari, “Effects of oblateness of the primaries on natural periodic orbit-attitude behaviour of satellites in three body problem,” Adv. Sp. Res., 2021.
[21]         E. Abbasali and M. Bakhteiari, “Restricted three body problem considering the perturbations of both oblate massive primaries,” J. Aerosp. Sci. Technol., vol. 13, no. 2.
[22]         V. K. Srivastava, J. Kumar, and B. S. Kushvah, “Regularization of circular restricted three-body problem accounting radiation pressure and oblateness,” Astrophys. Space Sci., vol. 362, no. 3, p. 49, 2017.
[23]         A. E. Ibrahim and A. K. Misra, “Attitude dynamics of a satellite during deployment of large plate-type structures,” J. Guid. Control. Dyn., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 442–447, 1982.
[24]         P. HUGHES, “Attitude dynamics of a three-axis stabilized satellite with a large flexible solar array,” in Guidance and Control Conference, 1972, p. 857.
[25]         A. J. Knutson and K. Howell, Coupled orbit and attitude dynamics for spacecraft composed of multiple bodies in earth-moon halo orbits, vol. 8. 2012.
[26]         K. C. Howell, “Three-dimensional, periodic,‘halo’orbits,” Celest. Mech., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 53–71, 1984.
[27]         D. Guzzetti and K. C. Howell, “Natural periodic orbit-attitude behaviors for rigid bodies in three-body periodic orbits,” Acta Astronaut., vol. 130, pp. 97–113, 2017.
Volume 15, Issue 1
April 2022
Pages 140-154

  • Receive Date 23 October 2021
  • Revise Date 01 February 2022
  • Accept Date 04 February 2022
  • First Publish Date 04 February 2022