Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 university of Tehran

2 University of Tehran

3 Iranian Space Research Center

Abstract

In this study, the performance requirements influencing the orbital and attitude control system of a geostationary satellite in the station-keeping flight mode considering the coupling effect of both attitude and orbital motion is determined. Controlling and keeping the satellite in its orbital window have been done using a set of four thrusters located on one side of the satellite body, with considering the coupling effect of the attitude motion on orbital motion. The satellite’s orbital motion could be disturbed by the attitude motion in the allowable orbital window. The main factors conducting this behavior are derived utilizing the satellite attitude and orbital dynamic equations of motion. In the mathematical analysis of this study, the effects of environmental perturbations originating from the oblateness of Earth, third mass gravity like sun and moon, and solar radiation pressure on the satellite dynamic behavior are also considered. Afterward, the condition of using four installed thrusters on one side of the satellite and the reaction wheels in order to control the satellite orbital and attitude motion is investigated. To reduce the satellite attitude’s error, a proportional-derivative controller is employed to activate the reaction wheels properly. The satellite positions in north-south and east-west directions are controlled by a specific array of thrusters in order to maintain in its predefined orbital window. The required amount of velocity variations for a duration of one year via some simulation may demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach in enhancing the orbital maintenance procedure of the satellite.

Keywords

Main Subjects

[1]           C. Pittet and D. Arzelier, Demeter: A benchmark for robust analysis and control of the attitude of flexible micro satellites, vol. 5, no. PART 1. IFAC, 2006.
[2]           T. Cussac et al., “The Demeter microsatellite and ground segment,” Planet. Space Sci., vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 413–427, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.pss.2005.10.013.
[3]           D. Lagoutte et al., “The DEMETER Science Mission Centre,” Planet. Space Sci., vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 428–440, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.pss.2005.10.014.
[4]           M. J. Sidi, Spacecraft Dynamics and Control: A Practical Engineering Approach. Cambridge University Press, 1997.
[5]           O. Montenbruck and E. Gill, Satellite Orbits: Models, Methods and Applications, vol. 134. 2000.
[6]           J. R. Wertz, Spacecraft Attitude Determination and Control. Springer Netherlands, 1978.
[7]           S. Gorove, “The Geostationary Orbit: Issues of Law and Policy,” Am. J. Int. Law, vol. 73, no. 3, p. 444, 1979, doi: 10.2307/2201144.
[8]           S. K. SHRIVASTAVA, “Orbital perturbations and stationkeeping of communication satellites,” J. Spacecr. Rockets, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 67–78, 1978, doi: 10.2514/3.27999.
[9]           L. G. Kraige and J. L. Junkins, “Perturbation formulations for satellite attitude dynamics,” Celest. Mech., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 39–64, Feb. 1976, doi: 10.1007/BF01228533.
[10]         T. Dougherty, Systems & control : an introduction to linear, sampled & non-linear systems. World Scientific, 1995.
[11]         M. P. Topland, “Nonlinear attitude control of the micro-satellite ESEO,” p. 121, 2004.
[12]         Agrawal, “Attitude control of flexible spacecraft using pulse-width pulse-frequency modulated thrusters.” 1997.
[13]         K. A., K. S., M. B., and F. M., “DESIGN OF OPTIMAL THRUSTERS CONFIGURATION FOR ATTITUDE CONTROL OF GEOSTATIONARY SATELLITE,” vol. 13, no. 13. MODARES MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, pp. 67–77, Jan. 01, 2014, Accessed: Nov. 12, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://en.journals.sid.ir/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=433564.
[14]         A.kosari and m.beiglari, “Investigation of the effect of satellite on relative positioning in transient processes with optimal control of PD,” 1395, [Online]. Available: https://www.civilica.com/Paper-AEROSPACE16-AEROSPACE16_423.html.
[15]         M.E, K.A, and F.M, “Two-Objective Optimization of Geo Communication Satellite Trajectory Considering Continuous Orbital Maneuver,” vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 142–152, Jan. 2013, Accessed: Nov. 12, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://en.journals.sid.ir/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=316230.
[16]         M. Navabi and M. Radaei, “Attitude adaptive control of space systems,” in 2013 6th International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies (RAST), Jun. 2013, pp. 973–977, doi: 10.1109/RAST.2013.6581356.
[17]         M. R. H. and M. B. M. Navabi, “Feedback Linearization for Spacecraft Attitude Control with Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulations,” p. 11, 2018, Accessed: Sep. 10, 2019. [Online]. Available: http://www.univelt.com/book=6314.
[18]         S. Soleymanpour and M. Navabi, “Integrated adaptive backstepping attitude control of spacecraft,” in 2017 IEEE 4th International Conference on Knowledge-Based Engineering and Innovation (KBEI), Dec. 2017, pp. 0949–0954, doi: 10.1109/KBEI.2017.8324935.
[19]         D. Losa, “High vs Low Thrust Station Keeping Maneuver Planning for Geostationary Satellites Damiana Losa High vs Low Thrust Station Keeping Maneuver Planning for Geostationary Satellites,” 2007.
[20]         S. R. Oleson, R. M. Myers, C. A. Kluever, J. P. Riehl, and F. M. Curran, “Advanced Propulsion for Geostationary Orbit Insertion and North-South Station Keeping,” J. Spacecr. Rockets, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 22–28, Jan. 1997, doi: 10.2514/2.3187.
[21]         S. Borissov, Y. Wu, and D. Mortari, “East–West GEO Satellite Station-Keeping with Degraded Thruster Response,” pp. 581–601, 2015, doi: 10.3390/aerospace2040581.
[22]         J. L. (James L. . Meriam and L. G. (L. G. Kraige, Dynamics. Wiley, 2012.